The
requirement here is for a moveable subject to be photographed under midday sun,
midday shade and finally when the sun is close to the horizon; the camera white
balance needed to be set to ‘daylight’ rather than auto. Firstly, I need to find some sun …and a
willing volunteer as I wanted to do this with a face.
Midday sun is
colourless or ‘white’ and light becomes coloured when some part of the spectrum
is missing. As the sun sets the colour
of the light becomes yellow, orange and then (sometimes) red as the light is
scattered by atmospheric particles and the distance the light travels from
source to observer at dawn and dusk is further, therefore increasing the
opportunity for scattering. The shorter
blue wavelengths get scatted more, so the remaining orange and red are
therefore visible to the eye. In the
shade on a sunny day the observed light comes from the blue part of the
spectrum. So to the images …
|
Full midday sunlight |
|
Midday shade |
|
Sun close to horizon |
My recollection
at the time of shooting was that there was little difference between the
colours of the images and that intensity of lighting was the only real
difference between them – the eye compensates wonderfully well. However, as can be seen from the photographs,
the fairly neutral lighting of the sunlight version was replaced by a distinct
blue/green cast (well, it is in the original – I have no idea what blogger will
do to it via Picasa !) which is due to the light reflected from the sky. The third image, which was lit by the late
afternoon sun not long before it dipped below the horizon, has picked up the
warmer orange tones from the last of the light and is by far the most pleasing
image of the three I found. By way of
measuring the differences in exposure of the images, and no changes were made
to the camera settings, the full sun version had a shutter speed of 1/1500sec,
the shade of 1/90sec and the evening horizontally lit version had a shutter
speed of 1/500sec. The difference between
the sunlit and shade versions was interesting as they were taken only forty
seconds and two yards apart, and I would not have predicted such an extreme
difference based on my memory of the time I took the images.
No comments:
Post a Comment